Candidate Improperly Used Nonprofit Branding in Posts
Nonprofit boards must tighten policies on candidate branding to protect 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.
Updated on Oct. 14, 2026 in Philanthropy
Live Poll
Should nonprofits strictly prohibit political activity by their board members while representing the organization?
Santa Clara City Council candidate Kimberley Williams used branding from the Santa Clara Schools Foundation in campaign photos on Sept. 20, 2026. The charity, which holds 501(c)(3) status, prohibits political endorsements and did not authorize the use of its materials.
Why it matters
Nonprofits face significant regulatory risks if their resources appear to back political campaigns, as federal law strictly limits 501(c)(3) entities from participating in partisan activities. This incident highlights the necessity for clear internal policies to prevent board members from inadvertently compromising a charity's tax-exempt standing.
The Santa Clara Schools Foundation maintains 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status, which prohibits participating in political campaigns. The foundation's board now enforces stricter logo and tagging prohibitions following the unauthorized campaign social media posts.
The players
Kimberley Williams
City Council candidate and former board president of the Santa Clara Schools Foundation.
Santa Clara Schools Foundation
A 501(c)(3) tax-exempt charity that provides community support for local schools.
The details
The foundation identified that its logo, banner, and branded tablecloth were featured in campaign photos taken at the Santa Clara Art & Wine Festival. To mitigate future risk, the organization is updating its board member commitment form to explicitly prohibit tagging and branded content in political posts. Staff now actively monitor and review social media tags on the organization's Facebook and Instagram accounts.
Timeline
June 2026: Kimberley Williams became board president of the foundation.
Sept. 20, 2026: Campaign photos were taken at the Santa Clara Art & Wine Festival.
Sept. 25, 2026: The foundation issued new guidance to board members regarding political activities.
Market Landscape
This incident follows the precedent set by IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status regulations that mandate strict neutrality for charitable entities. It illustrates the ongoing operational tension between the personal branding of board members and the compliance requirements of tax-exempt nonprofits.
Operators of tax-exempt entities should review board commitment forms to ensure they clearly restrict the use of organizational assets in political contexts. Boards must also establish protocols for social media monitoring to maintain compliance with federal political participation prohibitions.
The takeaway
Nonprofit leaders should assume all social media engagement by board members involving organizational property will be scrutinized for political bias. Proactively update board commitment forms and implement a social media tagging policy to mitigate risk to the organization's tax-exempt status.
Further reading
Learn more about the evolving standards for institutional oversight in the Philanthropy section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by San José Spotlight.
Live Poll
Should nonprofits strictly prohibit political activity by their board members while representing the organization?
