ISS Backed ATG Capital in Empery Digital Proxy Contest
Shareholders at the firm now face a choice between the current board and dissident nominees at the October meeting.
Updated on Sept. 25, 2026 in Public Companies
Live Poll
Do you support activist investors when they seek to replace a company's board of directors?
Institutional Shareholder Services recommended that investors vote for ATG Capital nominees at the upcoming Empery Digital annual meeting. The move follows a Delaware Court of Chancery ruling that found the board improperly rejected previous dissident nominations.
Why it matters
The board's governance practices have come under scrutiny after the company spent more than $20 million on a proxy contest to block challengers. The ISS recommendation highlights concerns regarding the board's substitution of its own judgment for that of shareholders.
ATG Capital holds 4.5 million shares, or over 16% of Empery Digital, while the company has incurred more than $20 million in proxy contest expenses. The board faces criticism for the rejection of nominations that the Delaware Court of Chancery deemed improper.
The players
Institutional Shareholder Services
A global advisory firm providing proxy research and governance recommendations to institutional investors.
ATG Capital
An investment firm that currently owns over 16% of Empery Digital.
Empery Digital
A public company currently embroiled in a high-stakes proxy contest for its board of directors.
Ian Read
An incumbent director at Empery Digital who is the target of an ISS withhold recommendation.
Orn Olason
An incumbent director at Empery Digital who is the target of an ISS withhold recommendation.
The details
ATG Capital is utilizing a universal proxy card to solicit votes after the board rejected its initial nominations on March 26, 2026. The proxy advisory firm characterized the board's internal functioning and committee oversight as less than robust. This struggle culminates in a vote on whether to retain incumbent directors Ian Read and Orn Olason or install the activist's proposed slate.
Timeline
March 26, 2026: The Empery Digital board rejected initial dissident nominations.
September 24, 2026: ISS issued its report regarding the ongoing proxy contest.
September 25, 2026: ATG Capital publicly announced the ISS recommendation.
October 14, 2026: The Empery Digital Annual Meeting of Stockholders is scheduled.
Market Landscape
This proxy battle follows the Delaware Court of Chancery ruling against the board's nomination invalidation, marking a significant check on corporate gatekeeping. The conflict reflects broader tensions over how boards exercise discretion when faced with activist investors seeking to overhaul governance.
Operators and investors should monitor how the $20 million in contest-related spending affects the company's capital allocation and operational focus. The outcome of the October 14 vote will dictate the future direction of the board and potential shifts in firm strategy.
The takeaway
The ISS recommendation serves as a reminder that robust board functioning is a critical metric for institutional support. Operators should review their own nomination procedures for legal vulnerabilities and ensure their board oversight processes are documented clearly.
What happens next
The Empery Digital Annual Meeting of Stockholders is scheduled for October 14, 2026.
Further reading
For more on governance trends, visit the Public Companies section.
Live Poll
Do you support activist investors when they seek to replace a company's board of directors?
