Johor Corporation Refutes Indonesian Forest Fire Links

The firm cites historical divestment records to clarify its lack of ownership in plantations currently accused of fire involvement.

Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Public Companies

Johor Corporation Refutes Indonesian Forest Fire Links

Live Poll

Should companies be held responsible for the environmental impact of entities they previously owned?

Johor Corporation has formally refuted allegations in a report by WALHI that the group is linked to land and forest fires in Indonesia. The company stated it does not own or operate any plantations outside Malaysia and provided evidence of its complete divestment from Indonesian entities.

Why it matters

Operators must manage reputational risks from third-party reports that link their historical supply chain or equity holdings to current environmental incidents. Johor Corporation claims these allegations create a false impression of ongoing ownership that harms the business and its state government stakeholders.

Johor Corporation reported total assets of RM26 billion for FY2025 while facing claims that it is among 21 companies linked to land and forest fires in Indonesia. The company maintains it holds no equity in Indonesian plantations following divestments finalized in 2007 and 2023.

The players

Johor Corporation

A state-owned investment holding company based in Johor Bahru with RM26 billion in assets.

WALHI

An environmental advocacy organization that tracks land use and industrial activity in Indonesia.

Kulim Malaysia Berhad

A plantation subsidiary of Johor Corporation that managed various international equity interests.

The details

Johor Corporation clarified its divestment timeline to counter allegations made by WALHI regarding fires that occurred between January and September 2026. The firm exited four Indonesian entities on August 8, 2007, and a fifth on September 26, 2007, followed by the divestment of its remaining two Indonesian interests by its subsidiary, Kulim Malaysia Berhad, on July 6, 2023. By documenting these sales, the corporation aims to distance its current operational footprint from foreign environmental liabilities.

Timeline

  1. August 8, 2007: Johor Corporation divested four Indonesian plantation companies.

  2. September 26, 2007: The group divested PT Trimurti Sumbertama.

  3. July 6, 2023: Kulim Malaysia Berhad sold its interest in two remaining Indonesian entities.

  4. January to September 2026: Period of the alleged forest fires in Indonesia.

  5. October 27, 2026: Johor Corporation issued a public rebuttal to the allegations.

Market Landscape

The dispute highlights the rising pressure on international conglomerates to account for historical land-use patterns under stricter global environmental reporting standards. It mirrors challenges faced by firms complying with the European Union Deforestation Regulation, which requires strict proof of supply chain integrity.

Maintain rigorous, updated divestment records to ensure your current holdings are distinct from legacy assets that may become subjects of third-party environmental claims. If your business model involves international equity, clearly document the dates and terms of past sales to avoid liability for current operational activities.

The takeaway

Legacy assets and historical divestments remain major sources of reputational liability when they are erroneously linked to current environmental issues. Operators should ensure that public-facing ownership records are consolidated and readily accessible to clarify their organizational boundaries when challenged by external reports.

Further reading

For more on how organizations navigate external reporting and stakeholder communication, see Public Companies.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Malay Mail.

Live Poll

Should companies be held responsible for the environmental impact of entities they previously owned?