Indian Companies Face Higher R&D Stakes After Trade Deals
As new trade deals open borders, exporters must ramp up R&D spending to match international quality standards.
Updated on Oct. 29, 2026 in International Trade
Live Poll
Should the government prioritize free trade agreements to increase market access for domestic businesses?
India finalized trade agreements with the United Kingdom, Oman, and New Zealand throughout 2025 to secure expanded market access. These deals require local firms to increase R&D investment to maintain competitiveness against an influx of international products.
Why it matters
These trade agreements expose domestic manufacturers to heightened foreign competition, necessitating a shift from low-cost production to innovation-led quality. To survive this transition, companies must prioritize R&D to meet the global standards required for new export markets.
The new agreements offer near-zero duty or tariff access for up to 99% of exports, a significant expansion of market reach. However, current domestic R&D spending remains at just 0.6% of GDP, far below the 3% target needed to compete under these terms.
The players
Janmejaya Sinha
Chairman of the Boston Consulting Group who monitors global competitive strategy.
The details
The government is using these free trade agreements to bypass traditional trade barriers, but this strategy shifts the burden of quality control to private enterprises. As domestic markets open to foreign goods, companies must pivot their operational spending toward product development and talent acquisition. This shift aims to move Indian exports from basic commodities to value-added goods that meet stringent global requirements.
Timeline
July 2025: India signed the CETA agreement with the United Kingdom.
December 2025: India concluded the CEPA agreement with Oman.
December 2025: India finalized the free trade agreement with New Zealand.
Market Landscape
These trade agreements follow a pattern of aggressive market opening, setting the stage for the broader European Union free trade agreement expected within three years. They force a structural shift for companies that have historically relied on protectionist pricing rather than product innovation.
Owners should re-evaluate their R&D budgets to ensure product quality aligns with the demands of these new open-market trade partners. Anticipate increased competitive pressure from foreign goods and adjust procurement and innovation strategies accordingly.
The takeaway
The move toward global market integration shifts the competitive baseline from domestic cost efficiency to international quality standards. Management should track the 3% R&D-to-GDP target as a benchmark for measuring their own firm's operational readiness for global competition.
Further reading
Operators can track evolving global trade requirements in the International Trade section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by MoneyControl.
Live Poll
Should the government prioritize free trade agreements to increase market access for domestic businesses?
