Four Companies Added to 2027 Denominational Divestment List
Institutional investors are cutting ties with firms that fail to meet specific climate and social engagement benchmarks.
Updated on Oct. 21, 2026 in Public Companies
Live Poll
Should religious institutions use their investment power to influence the policies of major corporations?
The Committee on Mission Responsibility Through Investment has finalized its 2027 divestment list, adding four major companies to its prohibited list. The move, which follows unsuccessful engagement efforts during the 2024 and 2025 proxy seasons, now heads to the Board of Pensions and the Presbyterian Foundation for implementation.
Why it matters
This shift highlights the increasing use of institutional investment mandates to enforce climate and social criteria on publicly traded firms. For operators, it underscores a growing alignment between religious institutional shareholders and specific environmental or social benchmarks that can dictate capital access and investor relations.
The 2027 list includes four companies added after failing to meet specific church climate and social criteria during two years of proxy engagement. The action follows authorizations granted during the 227th General Assembly, building on guidelines first established in 2016.
The players
Duke Energy
An electric power holding company serving millions of customers across the United States.
ConocoPhillips
A global independent exploration and production company focused on crude oil and natural gas.
GE Aerospace
A major provider of jet engines and integrated systems for commercial and military aviation.
Palantir Technologies
A software company specializing in big data analytics platforms for government and enterprise clients.
The details
The committee employed specific guideline metrics to engage companies during the 2024 and 2025 proxy seasons, seeking substantive operational changes. While GE Vernova successfully met these engagement benchmarks and avoided the list, the committee concluded that Duke Energy, ConocoPhillips, GE Aerospace, and Palantir Technologies failed to align with established church environmental and social standards. The decision now triggers a formal review process by the Board of Pensions and the Presbyterian Foundation.
Timeline
2016: Initial climate change criteria established at the 222nd General Assembly.
2024 proxy season: Committee engaged companies using guideline metrics.
2025 proxy season: Committee engaged companies using guideline metrics.
2026: 227th General Assembly approved divestment resolutions.
2027: The approved Divestment/Proscription List becomes effective.
Market Landscape
This move marks an escalation in the enforcement of the 2016 General Assembly climate change criteria. It follows a multi-year strategy of using proxy season engagement to influence corporate policy before resorting to divestment.
Operators should monitor how institutional investors incorporate proxy engagement into their ESG mandates to avoid potential capital restrictions. Businesses failing to meet specific, long-standing institutional benchmarks risk being flagged as divestment candidates during future assembly cycles.
The takeaway
Institutional investors are increasingly utilizing formal divestment lists to exert leverage over the operational strategies of public companies. Managers should audit their current alignment with key shareholder guidelines and prepare for rigorous engagement during upcoming proxy seasons.
Further reading
For more on how institutional shareholders influence corporate governance, visit Public Companies.
Source note: This article includes information reported by PC(USA).
Live Poll
Should religious institutions use their investment power to influence the policies of major corporations?
