Lawsuit Accused California of Falsifying Investor Data
Investors allege the state altered addresses to seize and sell securities, creating uncertainty for holders of unclaimed assets.
Updated on Oct. 9, 2026 in Public Companies
Live Poll
Do you trust your state government to accurately protect and return unclaimed private property?
Plaintiffs filed a federal lawsuit claiming California officials falsified overseas investor addresses to facilitate the seizure and sale of private property. The state program currently holds $15 billion across 84 million accounts.
Why it matters
The litigation raises significant concerns for investors and businesses regarding the integrity of state unclaimed property programs, which are often viewed as a reliable revenue stream for state governments. Allegations that address data was manipulated to expand jurisdiction could trigger increased scrutiny of how states handle dormant financial assets.
The California unclaimed property program manages $15 billion across 84 million accounts. Plaintiffs specifically cited the seizure of $708,641.22 in Google stock from an investor whose records were allegedly altered.
The players
Malia Cohen
The California Controller responsible for managing the state's unclaimed property program.
Kroll LLC
A financial advisory and risk management firm acting as a contractor for the state.
Kelmar Associates LLC
A firm specializing in unclaimed property consulting and audits for government entities.
George H. Wu
A U.S. District Judge overseeing the federal lawsuit in Los Angeles.
The details
The lawsuit alleges that Controller Malia Cohen and contractors Kroll LLC and Kelmar Associates LLC systematically replaced legitimate overseas addresses with California designations to claim property that otherwise fell outside state jurisdiction. Once labeled as California-based, these securities are automatically sold by the state upon receipt. The plaintiffs have requested a federal judge prohibit the state from seizing additional property while the investigation into these practices proceeds.
Timeline
February 2026: A Labor Department watchdog warned about $192 million in transferred unemployment funds.
October 2026: A state auditor identified $33,000 in mishandled employee overpayments.
October 7, 2026: Plaintiffs filed the motion in federal court.
January 21, 2027: A court hearing is scheduled before Judge George H. Wu.
Market Landscape
This litigation marks a major legal challenge to the established operational procedures of the California unclaimed property program. The case follows recent warnings from federal watchdogs regarding the commingling of $192 million in COVID-era unemployment benefits with unclaimed assets.
Operators and investors should audit their unclaimed property holdings to ensure contact information is updated correctly. Reviewing internal records for any assets reported as missing or dormant is recommended to mitigate the risk of state seizure.
The takeaway
The integrity of state-managed asset programs is under pressure following these allegations of address manipulation. Investors should verify that their contact details are accurate in all corporate records to prevent assets from being flagged as unclaimed and subject to potential liquidation.
What happens next
A federal court hearing on the motion to halt further property seizures is scheduled for January 21, 2027.
Further reading
For broader trends in asset recovery and state financial oversight, see our Public Companies section.
Live Poll
Do you trust your state government to accurately protect and return unclaimed private property?
