Employees Sue Brinker Over New York Tipped Wage Policy
The lawsuit challenges how Chili's manages staff scheduling and compensation for tipped workers in New York.
Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Hospitality
Live Poll
Should federal and state laws eliminate sub-minimum wages for tipped service employees?
Three former Chili's employees have filed a class action lawsuit in federal court challenging the legality of New York's sub-minimum wage for tipped workers. The legal challenge targets Brinker International and its operational practices regarding worker compensation and scheduling.
Why it matters
The lawsuit alleges that a reliance on customer-based ratings for shift assignments and the state's tipped wage structure create an environment where workers must endure harassment. This case forces hospitality operators to evaluate the legal risks of using customer feedback to dictate labor management.
Brinker International currently operates 36 Chili's locations in New York and more than 1,200 across the U.S. In New York, the tipped minimum wage ranges from $10.70 to $11.35, while the standard minimum wage is $16 to $17 per hour.
The players
Brinker International
A multinational hospitality company that owns and operates over 1,200 Chili's restaurants and 50 Maggiano's Little Italy locations.
The details
The plaintiffs argue that the current wage structure incentivizes behavior that leads to sexual and racial harassment. Additionally, the lawsuit claims that using customer ratings to determine employee schedules and table assignments is unlawful. If the litigation proceeds, it could impact how hospitality chains manage performance metrics and staff compensation structures.
Timeline
October 16, 2026: The class action lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Brooklyn.
Market Landscape
This lawsuit challenges the fundamental legal basis of New York's tipped minimum wage structure. It marks a potential shift in hospitality labor compliance relative to standard industry practice.
Operators in New York should monitor this case for potential changes to how customer feedback metrics influence labor assignments and pay. Counsel should review current shift-scheduling algorithms to ensure they comply with evolving wage and labor standards.
The takeaway
This case signals an emerging legal risk for restaurant chains that link scheduling and performance metrics to customer-derived data. Owners should review their employee assignment protocols to ensure that feedback-based systems do not create discriminatory or unlawful labor conditions.
Further reading
For broader trends in labor law and compensation, visit Hospitality.
Live Poll
Should federal and state laws eliminate sub-minimum wages for tipped service employees?
