Oklahoma Court Upheld Firing Over Duty Disputes
The ruling clarifies when Oklahoma employers can terminate staff unable to perform duties due to medical restrictions.
Updated on Oct. 14, 2026 in Jobs — General
Live Poll
Should employers be legally required to accommodate employees who can no longer perform their primary duties?
The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the Grand River Dam Authority acted within its rights when terminating a maintenance technician. The court rejected a due process challenge after the employee was unable to fulfill duties following a heart attack.
Why it matters
This decision clarifies the threshold for terminating employees who cannot return to their original roles due to medical restrictions. It confirms that offering alternative roles can satisfy employer obligations even if the new position carries lower pay.
The authority offered the technician a position at $29 per hour, a decrease from his original $32.79 hourly rate. The employee, who had worked for the authority since 2007, was terminated after declining the offer.
The players
Oklahoma Supreme Court
The state's highest court that provides final interpretation of employment and due process laws for Oklahoma entities.
Grand River Dam Authority
A state-owned utility company in Oklahoma responsible for operating power generation facilities like the Pensacola Dam.
The details
The maintenance technician at the Pensacola Dam was unable to perform essential job functions after a 2018 heart attack and subsequent surgery. After two years of administrative leave, the Grand River Dam Authority offered an alternative role that complied with his medical restrictions. When the employee declined the position, the authority proceeded with termination, which the court upheld after finding the employer had a reasonable basis for the decision.
Timeline
2007: Employee began working for the Grand River Dam Authority.
May 2018: Employee suffered a heart attack and underwent surgery.
August 2020: Employee was placed on administrative leave.
January 2022: Authority offered the employee a permanent position.
March 2022: Authority terminated the employee.
Market Landscape
This case follows the precedent set by the Americans with Disabilities Act regarding the evaluation of reasonable accommodation in employment disputes. The ruling aligns with broader labor standards governing how employers must weigh job availability when staff face permanent physical restrictions.
Business owners should document all attempts to offer modified or alternative positions to employees with medical restrictions to ensure compliance with state employment laws. Maintain clear records of salary changes and duty descriptions to support termination decisions if staff decline reasonable accommodations.
The takeaway
The ruling underscores the importance of having a formal, documented process for offering alternative work when staff can no longer perform their essential job functions. Consult with legal counsel regarding the specific requirements for documentation and accommodation offers under state and federal guidelines.
Further reading
For more on navigating workforce transitions, visit our Jobs — General section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Business Insurance.
Live Poll
Should employers be legally required to accommodate employees who can no longer perform their primary duties?
