Kansas Farmers Abandoned Irrigation Systems in 2008
The Arnold family transitioned to dryland operations to avoid rising costs and insufficient water supplies.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Agriculture

Live Poll
Is moving away from irrigation a viable strategy for long-term farm profitability in your area?
Steve and Kathleen Arnold transitioned their farm near Johnson City, Kansas, to dryland farming in 2008. The decision followed years of struggling with insufficient water and high irrigation expenses.
Why it matters
Operators facing limited water resources may find dryland techniques a necessary pivot to manage rising operational costs. This shift highlights the long-term trade-offs between resource-heavy production and regional environmental realities.
The Arnolds deactivated 10 irrigation circles in 2008, 18 years after the initial phase-out began. The operation now relies on an area that receives an average of 17.5 inches of rainfall annually.
The players
Steve Arnold
An operator of a farm near Johnson City, Kansas, who manages dryland agricultural production.
Kathleen Arnold
An operator of a farm near Johnson City, Kansas, who manages dryland agricultural production.
The details
The Arnolds implemented dryland farming techniques after determining that the costs of operating irrigation systems exceeded the value of water produced. By abandoning their equipment, the operators bypassed the maintenance and energy expenses associated with 10 irrigation circles. This move reflects a strategic shift toward conservation-focused land management in drought-prone regions.
Timeline
2008: The Arnold family turned off their irrigation systems.
June 2, 2026: Rainfall occurred at the Arnold farm.
Market Landscape
The Arnolds' transition follows the trend of resource-constrained agricultural operations forced to pivot away from high-water usage due to the ongoing depletion of the Ogallala Aquifer in Southwestern Kansas. This shift reflects a broader long-term strategy for local operators managing regional water scarcity.
Operators in regions with limited water should review the long-term cost-benefit ratio of irrigation infrastructure against dryland farming. Consider evaluating specific soil and rainfall data to determine if current equipment maintenance remains a viable competitive cost.
The takeaway
The Arnold farm's shift illustrates that abandoning resource-heavy infrastructure can be a sustainable long-term response to water scarcity. Operators should track their per-acre water consumption and compare those costs against potential dryland yield stability.
Further reading
For more on evolving land management, visit the Agriculture section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by DTN Progressive Farmer.
Live Poll
Is moving away from irrigation a viable strategy for long-term farm profitability in your area?






