Lincoln Charter Amendment Push Targets Election Timing
The campaign proposes new council term limits and election shifts that will impact local municipal policy and governance.
Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Philanthropy

Live Poll
Do you trust the influence of anonymous large-dollar donations in local ballot initiatives?
The Good Government Lincoln campaign raised nearly $1 million to support a proposed city charter amendment. The push seeks to align local municipal elections with statewide cycles while introducing term limits for city council members.
Why it matters
The campaign highlights the increasing role of 501(c)(4) nonprofits in local election advocacy, where organizational structures allow for significant spending without public donor disclosure requirements.
Restore the Good Life contributed $931,000 to the campaign, which raised nearly $1 million total. Forward Lincoln additionally allocated $470,000 toward political advertisements.
The players
Restore the Good Life
A 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization that funds political advocacy without mandatory donor disclosure.
Forward Lincoln
A campaign organization managing political advertisement purchases and funded by Good Government Lincoln.
Tanner Lockhorn
The treasurer for Restore the Good Life who was previously appointed to a judicial nominating commission in 2021.
Daniel Bass
The treasurer for Forward Lincoln.
Corben Waldron
An affiliate of Restore the Good Life who appeared in 2024 IRS filings and held a position on the Ricketts campaign payroll.
The details
The campaign utilizes a complex structure involving multiple entities to manage its advertising reach. Forward Lincoln directs funds toward television and radio slots, while individual conduits like Matt Schulte are used to leverage bulk purchasing power for cheaper media rates. This setup allows the nonprofit Restore the Good Life to funnel capital into the city charter initiative while maintaining the nondisclosure protections typical of 501(c)(4) status.
Timeline
2021: Tanner Lockhorn appointed to judicial nominating commission
2024: Corben Waldron listed in IRS filings
2025-2026: Corben Waldron on Ricketts campaign payroll
October 2026: The current campaign reporting period
Market Landscape
This activity follows a well-documented trend where campaigns utilize IRS 501(c)(4) tax-exempt organization requirements to shield donor identities while fueling local ballot initiatives. The strategy mirrors shifts in municipal election finance where non-disclosing entities increasingly drive advertising spend.
Operators in the city should track the upcoming charter amendment vote as it could fundamentally change the local council turnover rate and electoral cycles. Evaluate how these shifts in municipal campaign spending might influence future lobbying access and local business regulation.
The takeaway
The use of nonprofit conduits in local politics emphasizes the need for business owners to monitor campaign finance filings to identify the stakeholders behind municipal policy shifts. Operators should track the voting outcome on the charter amendment to anticipate changes in council membership turnover.
Further reading
For more on the intersection of local policy and private contributions, see our Philanthropy section.
Live Poll
Do you trust the influence of anonymous large-dollar donations in local ballot initiatives?






